A team member checked Polygonscan and saw unverified bytecode while the
page claims verified source. Both true: the source is exact-match
verified on Sourcify; Polygonscan is a separate registry nobody
submitted to. The page now explains the two-registry situation, that
the displayed bytecode is identical, and that Polygonscan publication
is in progress.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Shareable page from the 2026-08-13 source review: code immutability
(no proxy/delegatecall/selfdestruct, Sourcify exact match), same-tx
distribution (no pooled funds), locked prices and fee constants, the
honest list of owner powers with the 50% entry-fee cap, where unmatched
pass-ups go, and verify-yourself links. Linked from all public footers,
the payment-proof note, and the chatbot (canned + AI prompt).
Also: passed-over lists now exclude structurally-skipped uplines — a
level-N payment never checks the first N-1 uplines, so listing them as
"not eligible" was misleading.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
martbost