3867b28bd4
Marty: the answer has to cover what a member is risking when they send POL to somebody they have not spoken to and have no commitment from. The canned answer now leads the advice with "do not send anything until you have actually talked to that person and they have told you they will use it", then says plainly: the transfer is wallet to wallet and irreversible, there is no refund and no chargeback, support cannot pull it back, the gift is theirs whatever they do with it, and they are free to go quiet or spend it on something else without breaking any rule. It names the worst case for what it is, which is that a tank member joined with nobody working with them and may never have engaged, so an unanswered PIF is the easiest money on this site to lose. It gives the arithmetic both ways rather than only the upside: a gift that works costs about half, because the contract pays the sponsor 50 percent when they buy; a gift to someone who never answers costs all of it. It ends on never gift money you need and never borrow to do it. The same guidance goes into the AI prompt as a standing rule, so PIF is never sold as a tactic on any phrasing that misses the canned pattern, and a "should I PIF someone from the tank" question starts with talk to them first, not the mechanics. qa/chatbot-parse.mjs is now 16 assertions: the 9 response-shape cases plus 7 that pin each risk line, so a future rewrite cannot quietly drop them. qa/run.sh member: 0 bugs. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
76 lines
4.1 KiB
JavaScript
76 lines
4.1 KiB
JavaScript
// The OpenRouter response shapes that broke the chatbot on 2026-09-17, and the ones
|
|
// that must keep working. Runs the real parse branch from chatbot.js with a fake https
|
|
// server, so this is the actual code path, not a copy of it.
|
|
//
|
|
// Run: node qa/chatbot-parse.mjs
|
|
import http from 'node:http';
|
|
import https from 'node:https';
|
|
import { createRequire } from 'node:module';
|
|
const require = createRequire(import.meta.url);
|
|
|
|
const ok = [], bad = [];
|
|
const t = (n, c, extra) => { (c ? ok : bad).push(n + (c || !extra ? '' : ' -> ' + extra)); };
|
|
|
|
let BODY = '';
|
|
const srv = http.createServer((req, res) => { res.writeHead(200, { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' }); res.end(BODY); });
|
|
await new Promise(r => srv.listen(0, '127.0.0.1', r));
|
|
const port = srv.address().port;
|
|
|
|
// point chatbot.js's https.request at the local plain-http stub
|
|
const realRequest = https.request;
|
|
https.request = (opts, cb) => http.request({ ...opts, hostname: '127.0.0.1', port, protocol: 'http:', rejectUnauthorized: false }, cb);
|
|
process.env.OPENROUTER_API_KEY = 'test-key';
|
|
const cb = require('../chatbot.js');
|
|
cb.init({ dataDir: '.', chain: null });
|
|
|
|
const good = JSON.stringify({ choices: [{ message: { content: 'Here is a straight answer.' } }] });
|
|
const ask = async q => (await cb.answer(q)).reply;
|
|
const FAILMSG = /did not come back to me just now/;
|
|
|
|
// 1. the exact production failure: 200 with only keepalive padding, no JSON at all
|
|
BODY = '\n \n \n';
|
|
t('keepalive-only body no longer crashes into a dead end', FAILMSG.test(await ask('explain something obscure')));
|
|
|
|
// 2. the shape that ALSO arrives normally: keepalive padding, THEN the real JSON
|
|
BODY = '\n \n' + good;
|
|
t('keepalive padding before real JSON still parses', /straight answer/.test(await ask('explain something obscure')));
|
|
|
|
// 3. plain JSON, the happy path
|
|
BODY = good;
|
|
t('plain JSON still parses', /straight answer/.test(await ask('explain something obscure')));
|
|
|
|
// 4. SSE-style comment lines before the JSON
|
|
BODY = ': OPENROUTER PROCESSING\n: OPENROUTER PROCESSING\n' + good;
|
|
t('SSE comment lines before the JSON still parse', /straight answer/.test(await ask('explain something obscure')));
|
|
|
|
// 5. 200 with an empty content string is a failure, not a blank reply to the member
|
|
BODY = JSON.stringify({ choices: [{ message: { content: ' ' } }] });
|
|
t('empty content is treated as a failure, never sent as a blank answer', FAILMSG.test(await ask('explain something obscure')));
|
|
|
|
// 6. garbage that is not JSON at all
|
|
BODY = '<html>502 bad gateway</html>';
|
|
t('non-JSON body is handled', FAILMSG.test(await ask('explain something obscure')));
|
|
|
|
// 7. canned answers never touch the network, so they survive any outage
|
|
BODY = '';
|
|
const pif = await ask('Should I pif someone from the holding tank');
|
|
t('the PIF question answers with no AI at all', /PIF is a gift/.test(pif), pif.slice(0, 80));
|
|
t('and it says you cannot PIF someone still in the tank', /still sitting in the holding tank/.test(pif));
|
|
// Marty, 2026-09-17: the risk is the answer, not a footnote. Sending POL to someone
|
|
// who has never replied is the easiest money on the site to lose, so every one of
|
|
// these must survive any future edit to the wording.
|
|
t('it says talk to them and get a commitment FIRST', /do not send anything until you have actually talked to that person/i.test(pif));
|
|
t('it says the transfer is irreversible with no refund', /no refund, no chargeback/i.test(pif));
|
|
t('it says support cannot pull it back', /nothing we can do to pull it back/i.test(pif));
|
|
t('it says they may go quiet or spend it elsewhere', /go quiet, spend it on something else, or never sign in again/i.test(pif));
|
|
t('it flags the tank member as the highest risk case', /easiest money on this site to lose/i.test(pif));
|
|
t('it gives the honest arithmetic both ways', /costs you about half/.test(pif) && /costs you all of it/.test(pif));
|
|
t('it says never gift money you need and never borrow', /never gift money you need, never borrow/i.test(pif));
|
|
t('it never sells PIF as a tactic', !/you should (definitely |really )?pif/i.test(pif));
|
|
|
|
https.request = realRequest;
|
|
srv.close();
|
|
console.log('PASS ' + ok.length);
|
|
for (const b of bad) console.log('FAIL ' + b);
|
|
process.exit(bad.length ? 1 : 0);
|