Marty is a team leader, not a program founder: fix the #21 upgrade-tip wording on how-pay-works and in the chatbot
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@
|
||||
<tr><td>3</td><td>Wallet 3</td><td>Join once more under <strong style="color:var(--text)">Wallet 1's</strong> link. Your top hits 2 directs → <strong style="color:var(--gold)">qualified.</strong></td></tr>
|
||||
<tr><td>4</td><td>—</td><td>From now on, promote only <strong style="color:var(--text)">Wallet 1's link.</strong> It auto-routes each new joiner to whoever in your leg needs a direct next — filling and qualifying Wallets 2 and 3, then deeper. One link, forever.</td></tr>
|
||||
</tbody></table></div>
|
||||
<p style="color:var(--muted);line-height:1.65;margin:14px 0 6px"><strong style="color:var(--text)">Which position do you upgrade?</strong> Most members — including how our founder runs his #21 — concentrate upgrades on the <strong style="color:var(--text)">top position</strong>, and leave Wallets 2 and 3 lower. Here's why it works: your top sits above your whole structure, so it's eligible for pass-ups from every generation below it. And because a pass-up your lower positions aren't leveled-up enough to catch <strong style="color:var(--text)">travels up to the first position that is</strong> (that's the <a href="#cap" style="color:var(--teal)">"does it cap at 8 levels?"</a> mechanic), keeping your top the most-leveled means the deeper catches your Wallets 2 and 3 can't hold <strong style="color:var(--text)">flow up into your top wallet</strong> instead of slipping past. You build <strong style="color:var(--text)">one</strong> strong position — and since you own all three, the earnings stay in your family either way. Upgrading all three is an option too, but it costs 3× the upgrades; concentrating on the top is the leaner play. As always, upgrades are optional, self-paced, and best funded by earnings (never out of pocket).</p>
|
||||
<p style="color:var(--muted);line-height:1.65;margin:14px 0 6px"><strong style="color:var(--text)">Which position do you upgrade?</strong> Most members — including how our team leader runs his #21 — concentrate upgrades on the <strong style="color:var(--text)">top position</strong>, and leave Wallets 2 and 3 lower. Here's why it works: your top sits above your whole structure, so it's eligible for pass-ups from every generation below it. And because a pass-up your lower positions aren't leveled-up enough to catch <strong style="color:var(--text)">travels up to the first position that is</strong> (that's the <a href="#cap" style="color:var(--teal)">"does it cap at 8 levels?"</a> mechanic), keeping your top the most-leveled means the deeper catches your Wallets 2 and 3 can't hold <strong style="color:var(--text)">flow up into your top wallet</strong> instead of slipping past. You build <strong style="color:var(--text)">one</strong> strong position — and since you own all three, the earnings stay in your family either way. Upgrading all three is an option too, but it costs 3× the upgrades; concentrating on the top is the leaner play. As always, upgrades are optional, self-paced, and best funded by earnings (never out of pocket).</p>
|
||||
<div class="callout warning" style="margin-top:14px"><strong>Do this the honest way:</strong> the Triple Play costs about <strong>3× a single entry</strong>. Only use money you can comfortably afford to lose — <strong>never borrowed, and nobody should ever fund it for someone else</strong> (that puts one person in control of positions registered to another's wallet). It's a faster <em>start</em>, <strong>not a guarantee of income</strong> — the positions still grow only through real team-building. One position is perfectly fine; the Triple Play is simply there for those who want a running start.</div></div>
|
||||
<div class="notice" style="margin-top:20px"><strong>The one line to remember:</strong> You keep your directs' entry money. For upgrades, <strong>each person below you pays you at exactly one level — the one that matches their depth beneath you.</strong> Twos are for <em>building</em>; depth-matched levels are for <em>paying</em>.</div>
|
||||
<p class="micro" style="margin-top:14px">Every figure is a contract rule, verifiable on-chain, not a promise of income. Most participants may not profit. <a href="/disclaimer" style="color:var(--teal)">Full disclaimers →</a> · <a href="/contract" style="color:var(--teal)">How the contract works →</a></p>
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user