Marty approves specific people for multiple accounts (partners, staff, a spouse on a
shared machine) and needed a way to say so without the guard fighting him.
Admin > Members > Duplicate signals now carries an "Approved exceptions" list: add an
email with a note, see who is on it and when, remove one. It sits directly under the
signals so the two are read together.
An exception can be added against the address they ALREADY have, not just the new one.
That matters because the usual case is approving a person before their second address
exists, and at sign-up time the new address is unknown to us. checkSignup now tracks
every account the sign-up collided with, and clears the block if either side is approved.
Clearing the HARD flags matters as much as clearing the block. Those flags are what
silently drop an account off the leaderboard and bar it from adopting out of the holding
tank, so an approved person would have been "allowed" in name only. They now keep both.
The account is tagged 'allowlisted' instead, so the admin sees why it went through, and
the server logs the exception by name.
Suspension still wins. An exception is permission to hold several accounts, not immunity
from being suspended for something else.
qa/fraud-allow.mjs (12 assertions) boots its own server and walks the real flow: first
account created, second blocked with the Qualified Start redirect, exception added,
second account now created, no hard flag left on it, exception visible in the admin
report, removing it blocks again, malformed address refused, endpoint admin-only.
qa/sponsor-note.mjs 5, qa/run.sh member 0 bugs.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Marty signed in and was told "You're joining the line of @bliss". He is member #1.
Cause: the last-touch sponsor cookie lives 30 days, and /api/sponsor set invited
purely from that cookie. So any member who had ever clicked a teammate's invite link
was greeted on the sign-in screen as though logging in would place them under that
person. Untrue, and alarming in exactly the wrong place: their sponsor locked at their
first purchase and nothing on that screen can move it. Anyone seeing that would
reasonably worry their line was about to change.
The greeting now shows when someone actually arrived through a link (?ref= in the URL),
or when the cookie is present AND this browser has never had an account, which is the
genuine "came back later to finish joining" case. A browser that already has an account,
or a signed-in session, never sees it.
Attribution is deliberately untouched: the cookie still resolves, the sponsor id is
still returned, and placement still works exactly as before. Only the greeting changed.
fraud.hasAccountOnDevice(req) is the new signal, reusing the device cookie the
one-account-per-person checks already set.
qa/sponsor-note.mjs (5 assertions) boots its own throwaway server and creates a REAL
account so the case is proven rather than assumed: still greeted with ?ref=, still
greeted from the cookie on a browser with no account, NOT greeted on the browser that
has one, and attribution still resolving. qa/run.sh member: 0 bugs.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Follow-on to the risk rewrite. Two gaps it exposed.
Members ask this without the word PIF: "should I fund their first package", "can I
buy it for them", "can I front someone the $20". Those were falling through to the
AI, which answered reasonably but told the member to "read the full warning on your
training page" - a page section that does not exist and that they would go looking
for. The pattern now also matches a paying verb plus an explicit for-someone-else
phrase, so these get the full canned answer with the risk in it. It deliberately
needs BOTH halves: "which package should I buy" must not be stolen.
The prompt now forbids sending anyone to a warning, guide or page section that is
not in the PAGES list, and requires plain ASCII (the model was emitting non-breaking
hyphens in "Wi-Fi").
Fixed two first-match-wins routing bugs, one of them mine from the previous commit:
"what do I get for buying a package" was returning the commission split, because I
had widened the earnings pattern to "what do I get" when it should only ever have
been "what do I get paid". And "should I buy the $20 package" previously matched
nothing at all and burned an AI call on a question we have a written answer for.
CANNED is an ordered list, so any pattern edit can silently steal a neighbour. The
suite now pins a 19-case routing table across PIF, price, earnings and the tank, so
the next person to widen a regex finds out immediately. qa/chatbot-parse.mjs is 35
assertions. qa/run.sh member: 0 bugs.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Marty: the answer has to cover what a member is risking when they send POL to
somebody they have not spoken to and have no commitment from.
The canned answer now leads the advice with "do not send anything until you have
actually talked to that person and they have told you they will use it", then says
plainly: the transfer is wallet to wallet and irreversible, there is no refund and
no chargeback, support cannot pull it back, the gift is theirs whatever they do with
it, and they are free to go quiet or spend it on something else without breaking any
rule. It names the worst case for what it is, which is that a tank member joined
with nobody working with them and may never have engaged, so an unanswered PIF is
the easiest money on this site to lose.
It gives the arithmetic both ways rather than only the upside: a gift that works
costs about half, because the contract pays the sponsor 50 percent when they buy;
a gift to someone who never answers costs all of it. It ends on never gift money
you need and never borrow to do it.
The same guidance goes into the AI prompt as a standing rule, so PIF is never sold
as a tactic on any phrasing that misses the canned pattern, and a "should I PIF
someone from the tank" question starts with talk to them first, not the mechanics.
qa/chatbot-parse.mjs is now 16 assertions: the 9 response-shape cases plus 7 that
pin each risk line, so a future rewrite cannot quietly drop them.
qa/run.sh member: 0 bugs.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Marty hit "I hit a snag answering that one" on "Should I pif someone from the
holding tank". Two separate problems behind it.
The real bug: OpenRouter pads a slow upstream with keepalive lines before the JSON,
and when the provider gives up it can close having sent ONLY that padding. HTTP 200,
no body. JSON.parse threw and EVERY non-canned question died the same way, not just
this one. Now we find the actual JSON object in the stream, treat an empty answer as
a failure rather than sending a blank reply, retry once (the usual cause is one
provider dropping the request), and if both attempts fail we say plainly that it was
our side, not their question, and point at a person.
The content gap: PIF and the holding tank were in the system prompt but had no canned
answers, so they depended on the AI being up. Both are now canned and instant. The PIF
answer leads with the thing the question gets wrong, which is that you cannot PIF
somebody still in the tank: adopt first, they link a wallet, then the button appears.
It is honest that nothing obliges them to buy, that crypto transfers are irreversible,
and that the 50 percent coming back only happens if they actually purchase.
Also fixes a pre-existing routing bug found while testing: "how much do I earn"
returned the PACKAGE PRICE ladder, because the price pattern matches "how much do"
and the commission pattern only caught "how much earn".
qa/chatbot-parse.mjs (9 assertions) drives the real parse branch against a stub
server for every response shape: keepalive-only, keepalive-then-JSON, plain JSON,
SSE comments, empty content, non-JSON. qa/run.sh member: 0 bugs.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The member card showed the wallet address on its own, directly above "Registered:
no (payouts off)". That reads as "he is set up" when he is not, and it caused a
real misread today on @mcbit1: wallet linked, memberId 0 on chain, every sale in
his line walking up to his sponsor while the row looked healthy.
Linking a wallet is a free signature that tells the site which address is theirs.
Switching on payouts is a separate transaction that creates the position. Only the
second one makes them payable, so the two states now say so:
Main wallet 0x30a7…5703 payouts OFF
Registered no wallet linked, but payouts were never switched on, so no
position exists. Sales in their line walk up to their sponsor and
lock there.
and the no-wallet case says "no wallet linked yet" instead of the same text.
qa/run.sh member: 0 bugs (the 2 warnings are pre-existing and unrelated).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Marty, 2026-09-16, after @megamol created megamol2/megamol3 under his own link and bought $20 on each
to fake his two qualifying buyers. fraud.js records sign-up IP/UA/browser id (iap.dev cookie set with
the code request) and last-seen on sign-in. New accounts: dup-device (browser already has an account)
and sponsor-device are refused, ip-burst (> fraudMaxSignupsPerIpDay, default 2, per 24h) is refused;
sponsor-ip and shared-ip are flagged only. Flagged/suspended accounts never count on the leaderboard
and cannot adopt from the tank; suspended accounts are signed out everywhere (auth.fromRequest
wrapper) and refused at sign-in. Admin > Members: Duplicate signals card (shared browser / IP,
flagged, suspended), flags badge, Suspend/Unsuspend; GET /api/admin/fraud; PATCH members {suspend,
reason, flags}. Telegram admin alert on every block/flag. Privacy page + chatbot prompt updated.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Audit against the live site: removed stale text (featured links and visit packs marked "coming",
Pipeline "coming soon", the superseded sponsor-hold rule, a non-existent home-page calculator,
"earned credits spend on banner and text only", "Coaching pane"); added live featured and visit-pack
rules with prices and limits, the video cap and rewards, the sign-in bonus and claim ladders,
report-an-ad, the public missed-payout posts, the walk-up gain notice, the four-minute overview
video, the promo Videos and Toolkit tabs; new canned answers for featured links, visit packs and
"what is this". KNOWLEDGE_DATE constant + qa/chatbot-sync.mjs (run in public/all QA) fails when a
release note is newer than the chatbot's knowledge.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Campaign #134 (NAS ad 2806) had the member's join-page link in the image field and served a broken
banner 141 times on the network; #102 did the same with an imgbb page link. imageCheck() accepts
/uploads/ and instantadpay.com/banners files and image extensions outright, otherwise HEADs the URL
(one redirect) and requires image/*. Wired into member and house campaign creation for banners and
login-ad creatives. Form placeholder + hint point at Promo tools > Banners > Copy image URL.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Marty, 2026-09-16: make missing a payout visible. On a TierPaid with hops>0 the PassedUp events of the
same tx name the skipped positions, with the reason and how many qualifying buyers they had; the post
says the amount and who received it instead. On a Purchase whose buyer was routed past an unactivated
sponsor (movedByTx set by sponsorSyncOnEvent), the post names the sponsor who missed the whole sale
and the upline who now owns that buyer for good. Both go to the main feed and the shared payments
topic unless the events mode is 'none'.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Marty, 2026-09-16, after the third "why didn't my sponsor get paid" thread of the day (livedreams / gracie25,
Morten / Terry's linked wallets). GET /api/my/trace?who=<#|username> (yourself, anyone up to 3 levels
below you, or your own 3 uplines) and GET /api/admin/trace?who= list every purchase the member was
part of, newest first: buyer, sponsor, package, then levels 1-3 with the recipient, the skipped
positions and the reason ("not qualified: had N of 2 qualifying buyers then"), the platform share, and
a verify link. Linked extra wallets are named after their owner. Earnings tab card "Trace a payment";
admin member card gets a "Payment trace" section; chatbot canned answer + AI prompt route the
question there.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Marty, 2026-09-16: a purchase must never wait on a sponsor who has not linked a wallet / switched on
payouts. /api/sponsor and /me now walk the site's sponsor line upward to the first upline that is
activated with payouts on (not on the no-payout list) and the buy proceeds under them; nobody
activated -> the catch position (#1). The buyer sees a one-line notice and carries on; admin gets a
heads-up. When the position is created on-chain (MemberActivated), sponsorSyncOnEvent re-points the
buyer's stored sponsor to whoever was paid (#1 included), so the referral leaves the skipped
sponsor's line for good, then sends the pointed notices: the skipped sponsor(s) are told they lost
this referral permanently and how to switch on payouts; the sponsor who was paid is told the
referral is theirs for good and to coach the one who missed it (teach-forward). Admin lookup:
GET /api/admin/sponsor-resolve?ref=. Only a transient chain error still pauses a buy.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Hugh's Earnings page showed no payouts, referrals or purchases: /api/my/activity read the last 600
events and the window had moved past his Sept 9-10 activity. Ten other readers (dashboard earned
total, leaderboard, holding-tank own-buy check, admin member view, growth snapshot, P&L, burner
match) treated the same list as complete. KEEP_EVENTS 600 -> 250000; chain.rescan() rebuilds from
deployBlock without re-firing onEvent (no repeat Telegram/email), keeps real ts for known events and
estimates ts by block height for backfilled ones; runs once at boot when a filled window is found;
admin routes POST /api/admin/chain/rescan and GET /api/admin/chain/status. State file only rewritten
when events changed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Same class of bug as the campaign #27 false report: the Shorts report was a prompt() pre-filled with
'inappropriate'. Members now tap a reason button on purpose or cancel. Script tags bumped.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Campaign #27 (house AdRevSplit text ad) was reported "broken" with no note while the target framed
and loaded fine; the report dialog was prompt() with 'broken' as the default value, so one stray OK
filed it. Now IAP.ask with an explicit, validated reason and an optional note; common.js tag bumped
on all pages.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Hugh earned a 10-credit sign-in bonus, then bought a 280-credit extension; earned credits spend
first, so Earned read 0 and the bonus looked lost. There was no record a member could check.
Now every real credit movement writes a credit_log row (JSON store in file mode): welcome, sign-in
bonus with streak, daily claim, inbox reads, video watches, verified visits, milestone/leaderboard
bonuses, partner codes, admin/team grants, AI Copy Engine charges + refunds, flat buys (featured
run, extension, visit pack, more visits), login-ad days, and metered delivery rolled up per
campaign per day; on-chain purchased-credit spends are marked. GET /api/my/credits/activity;
dashboard shows the last 40 under Campaigns (also when there are no campaigns) with a link from
Earn credits. Chatbot canned answer + AI prompt updated; my.js tag bumped.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Hugh extended his featured link and his balance fell 1,133 -> 0: the row still carried the 1,400
parked by the old add-credits button, and reactivating it reserved that budget again. Both flat
paths now set budget to spent + accrued + cost. Featured Run column shows "N of M days left"
(Hugh: "says 14 but it's actually 7") and "M days done" after the run.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Hugh and Michael both added credits to a featured run expecting more days. Featured is a flat
daily buy, so the credits sat unspent until the run ended and their balance read 0 meanwhile.
Now: /api/my/campaigns/:id/extend books extra days after the current run (or from today if it
ended) and charges them at once; top-up refuses featured; a visits top-up buys more visits at the
pack rate, charged now; rows show paid up front + day count + runs through <date> / run ended;
explainer under the campaign table; chatbot canned answer + AI prompt updated; my.js v tag bumped.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
martbost